Talk:iahen

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Verification debate[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


-- Prince Kassad 22:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed from German lexicons: [1] [2], [3] — This comment was unsigned.
Has a de interwiki, if that means anything (I repeat, if). Mglovesfun (talk) 12:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to cite it now, give me at least two days given the difficulty. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Seems ok, I added three citations (admittedly, I don't understand every word of them) but there seem to be plenty of citations on Google Books. I just tried "Esel iah" and "Esel iahen" to get three citations, although those searches alone get about 60 total results. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The verb is ok. It is also listed in the w:Duden. But I never heard of the synonyms yahen, iahnen and found no evidence that they really exist. --Zeitlupe 06:33, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I found 2 refs for yahnen Googlebooks 1 Googlebooks 2 And here some direct translation of "bray" as iahnen, also googlebooks ... --WissensDürster 07:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you know that there are three (not just two) citations that meet Wiktionary:Attestation supporting a term, add the term. You can use [[iahen]] as a model. It is helpful to put the citations in the entry. If you are not confident in your ability to add the entry, add the citations to the appropriate citations page. Wherever you put the quotes, you might find {{quote-book}} to be a convenient way to format what you cut-and-paste from Google Books. DCDuring TALK 10:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Citations:iahen is completed for days. Now, why is the entry still listed here? Which problem is left to meet the inclusion criteria? --WissensDürster 11:17, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]