I have changed a short definition which is not really right by what I think is a more accurate definition, but very wordy and inelegant. I hope somebody can improve on it. Or maybe it is thought that the original definition was OK?
It was "inexactness, errors for example in measurements" Pol098 01:11, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Myself, I liked the former concise definition. Perhaps the encyclopedic bit could at least be shunted to a ===Usage note=== or something? --Connel MacKenzie 04:59, 25 July 2005 (UTC)