Talk:let alone

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

RFV discussion[edit]

Keep tidy.svg

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

Rfv-sense: ({idiom, proscribed) (where the second element is more likely than, or implies, the first) or even / I doubt if there are twenty, let alone ten.

And then there's the question of who proscribes it. DCDuring TALK 20:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, sense removed. I'm pretty sure I have heard people misuse this expression in the way described, but it's rare enough, and wrong enough, that I don't really mind our failing to cover it. :-P   —RuakhTALK 18:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion debate[edit]

Green check.svg

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

let alone [edit]

RfD Verb: "to leave alone". I believe that this is both less commonly used than and aesthetically inferior to leave alone. If we are going to include NISoP terms as translations targets, then we should include preferentially the better and more common ones and discourage translation effort being dissipated on inferior and less common ones. The rationale would be something akin to the aesthetic and frequency considerations for the Phrasebook. DCDuring TALK 02:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

But is this NISoP? The meaning is arguably compositional, but the grammar is odd. Can let take a noun plus any other adjective or adverb as its complement? —RuakhTALK 03:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
"Let" licenses "loose" and "free" too. DCDuring TALK 14:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps keep per the reasonable doubt test. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I think I was wrong. {{trans-see}} addresses the aesthetic objection. DCDuring TALK 14:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Kept. Mglovesfun (talk) 00:08, 12 November 2010 (UTC)



suchaUXthen'db.gud!(esp.asDEFnoiziformulated4layperson..(prapsLNKneg/pospolarity? 20:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)