Talk:presex
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion
[edit]The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
To me, it's used more attributively like an adjective (presex talk, presex romance). Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 04:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- RFV failed, entry rewritten. —RuakhTALK 14:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)