Talk:pull the fire alarm
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Connel MacKenzie in topic pull the fire alarm
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Previously nominated for deletion in a group nomination, but no consensus was reached about this page. The original argument for their deletion was sum of parts. —{admin} Pathoschild 16:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Sum of its parts. --Dmol 17:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- Unidiomatic - deleted. — Paul G 08:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not used in the UK. --Enginear 16:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Then it passes Pauley #1, the fancy dress test. DAVilla 21:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- It is idiomatic in the sense that you don't necessarily need to pull something in order to activate a fire alarm. Edit: Keep. DAVilla 21:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Good points. But I don't recall ever seeing a fire alarm "pull" that didn't say "pull down" or "break glass, pull lever" or similar. AFAIK, they do require a "pull" of one sort or another. Don't they? If they do, that would reinforce the Pauley #1 argument. If they don't, that would reinforce DAVilla's second point. Either way, it looks like the request has merit, so I second the restore. --Connel MacKenzie 18:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)