Talk:pulling a train
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic RFV
RFV
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/TK_archive_icon.svg/55px-TK_archive_icon.svg.png)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
"to pull a train" is apparently sex slang for to have sex with several partners consecutively with little or no rest between them. We'll worry about formatting if it's attested. --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Should be at pull a train, of course. I would vouch for its actual existence in the wild. Don't know about attestability. DCDuring TALK 14:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Would be attestable from Usenet, of course, but better from this bgc search. DCDuring TALK 14:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- I detagged it directly; hope nobody minds that. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- I sure don't. Though this isn't in "widespread use" generally, it seems to be part of coming-of-age for American males to learn about this. DCDuring TALK 18:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- I detagged it directly; hope nobody minds that. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- Would be attestable from Usenet, of course, but better from this bgc search. DCDuring TALK 14:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- It just saves time really; if there's no doubt that the term is attestable, simply copying up the citations is a low priority, given the number of entries tagged with rfv or rfv-sense. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)