Talk:yuk
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Should I add the verb, "to yuk it up" here, or under another article?zigzig20s 09:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- It could be listed in a ===Derived terms=== section. Isn't it yuk it up? --Connel MacKenzie 04:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, it's just that it is a verb, the preposition in the definition isn't important. I wouldn't have used it in the definition anyway, I just wouldn't not say it when I'm talking/typing...Thanks for the info though.zigzig20s 08:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
RFD discussion[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
"Tocharian A" language section - no ISO 639 code. --Connel MacKenzie 04:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- It's a real Indo-European language, but it's long extinct. See w:Tocharian languages for information about Tocharian A and B. I don't know any more than the article; they're pretty obscure languages. --EncycloPetey 04:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. --Connel MacKenzie 08:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Where are you getting your ISO 639 codes from? Tocharian A does indeed have one, and it's xto. --Ptcamn 00:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)