Talk:zenzizenzic
Request for verification[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
It's in the OED entry for (deprecated template usage) zenzic, but with only one quotation, which capitalizes it, writes it with a capital letter, defines it, and spells it differently (Zenzizenzike). —RuakhTALK 15:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- I just added 3 citations from google books. Goldenrowley 05:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
RFV Passed. Goldenrowley 05:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's a bit premature to count this as passed. One of those cites is for (deprecated template usage) zenzizenzizenzic. The other two don't have the same part of speech, and I can't decipher the adjective cite. —RuakhTALK 20:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
- Correct me if I am wrong but right now we're just trying to find 3 usages to pass: not three for each part of speech. With 392 hits on Google and 3 uses in Google books, generally the word is passing. The compound was my oversight: I did not notice it was part of a line-breaked longer word, when I added it. To replace that, there's a third cite at Google books but I can't get the snippet to work: Robert Burton, Philosophaster: Philosophaster - Page 41 by Robert Burton, Connie McQuillen, 1993. Goldenrowley 05:52, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's three per sense, else how would
{{rfv-sense}}work? —RuakhTALK 17:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's three per sense, else how would
All senses RFV failed; citations moved to Citations:zenzizenzic, together with a weird thing that an anon added[1] that may or may not be a quotation. —RuakhTALK 20:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)