Template talk:dialect
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic RFM
RFM
[edit]The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
[[Template:dialect]] - [[Template:dialectal]]
I think they both denote the exact same thing, in which case they should probably be merged into one. -- Prince Kassad 19:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- They categorize identically, and seem to denote the same thing, but display differently (as dialect and dialectal, respectively), which may be useful in such constructions as {{rare|or|dialectal}} and {{jargon|or|dialect}}.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- Note also the existence of
{{dialects}}
and{{regional}}
.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)- Though
{{regional}}
categorizes in Regional English, not just Regional. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)- Redirect {{temp|dialect}} and {{temp|dialects}} to {{temp|dialectal}}. When nouns are used attributively, it's very rarely in the plural, and there's no need to use the noun attributively when there's a perfectly good adjective dialectal. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone redirecting must first check all uses of the template being modified to make sure they won't be ruined by said redirection.—msh210℠ (talk) 18:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Correct. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:19, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone redirecting must first check all uses of the template being modified to make sure they won't be ruined by said redirection.—msh210℠ (talk) 18:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Redirect {{temp|dialect}} and {{temp|dialects}} to {{temp|dialectal}}. When nouns are used attributively, it's very rarely in the plural, and there's no need to use the noun attributively when there's a perfectly good adjective dialectal. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- Though