Template talk:pt-noun-mf
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic Deletion debate
Deletion debate
[edit]The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Precisely the same reasons as {{es-noun-m}}
(et al.) above. {{pt-noun}}
works perfectly well. One slight difference is the relative frequency of each template:
{{pt-noun}}
: 479{{pt-noun-m}}
: 366{{pt-noun-f}}
: 292{{pt-noun-mf}}
: 83
So orphaning it would be an easier job than for {{es-noun-m}}
above. Though that in itself is not a reason to delete these. The reason is they offer nothing that {{pt-noun}}
doesn't do, or couldn't do very easily. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete redundant Portuguese templates per Mglovesfun. --Daniel. 11:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Yair rand (talk) 17:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Even more surprisingly bad templates; since {{pt-noun}}
allows - to show uncountability. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete both. --Yair rand 04:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oprhaned anyway, using
{{pt-noun|m|-}}
and{{pt-noun|f|-}}
. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oprhaned anyway, using
All fail. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)