Gothic calques -- t:calque does not automatically add to cat:Gothic calques?

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Rua
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I think it would be best to show it as a reconstructed term, so with * in front.

CodeCat00:25, 30 May 2016

I went ahead and did just that. Waddjus should probably also be moved to RC now?

Kleio (t · c)00:49, 30 May 2016

BTW the nominative plural for 𐍅𐌰𐌳𐌳𐌾𐌿𐍃 claims to have the sequence -ddjj- in it. Is this for real (how would it have been pronounced, for example)? is it attested?

Benwing2 (talk)04:10, 30 May 2016

Yes, that is a problematic point; none of the compounds containing that word are attested in the nom. plural, the one you see is merely generated by the template. It came up in this discussion, and was not resolved. I personally am not sure how to proceed with those words, they're very irregular to say the least.

Kleio (t · c)12:46, 30 May 2016

I think you should put a ? in place of the word.

Benwing2 (talk)20:32, 30 May 2016

Probably a good idea, but I don't think there's a parameter in the template to replace just the nominative plural, or at least I'm not good enough with templates to figure out how to do that :/

Kleio (t · c)23:52, 30 May 2016