User talk:Ruakh/2018

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

February 2018[edit]

Hey. Is this page still relevant? Can it be deleted? Or perhaps updated? --Otra cuenta105 (talk) 20:40, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've now updated the page from the latest XML dump. I think it's still relevant, but YMMV. —Ruakh 05:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please review your recent revert at χ. It seems as though you reverted my edit because it was tagged as "no head temp", but I didn't remove any template and in fact I was just correcting a link to a Wikipedia page that just got moved. The problem seems to have persisted before my arrival at the page, which I don't know how to fix at the moment. Nardog (talk) 05:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mea culpa. I was going through and marking all of that set of changes as checked ("patrolled" in MediaWiki parlance); for that one I must have misclicked somehow. (The only change of yours that I intentionally reverted was génius?diff=50070343.)
Sorry about that!
Ruakh 17:31, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. In the future, if you need to perform this sort of bulk edit, please solicit a bot owner. Otherwise you're not really saving any effort, because someone has to go through and mark all your changes as checked anyway. —Ruakh 17:31, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Hebrew passive participles[edit]

I've added {{form of|Passive participle|חָנַן|lang=he|tr=khanán}} as a definition line at חָנוּן. What do you think of this "definition"? What do you think of our making it a he- template?​—msh210 (talk) 11:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. I think the closest English analogue would be agent nouns like giver and biter, where although we sometimes start a definition with "Agent noun of [verb]" (with no template or even formatting, sadly), we never let that be the whole definition. Personally I've been putting "Passive participle of [verb]" in the etymology section rather than the sense line. But I don't feel strongly about it. —Ruakh 05:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]