Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-09/User:Daniel. for desysopping: difference between revisions

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Liliana-60 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
<!-- Enter {{subst:support}} on next blank line to vote in support of this nomination. -->
<!-- Enter {{subst:support}} on next blank line to vote in support of this nomination. -->
# [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] '''Support''' [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 16:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC) as I noted in my edit summary, with regret, but not with reservations. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 16:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
# [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|20px]] '''Support''' [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 16:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC) as I noted in my edit summary, with regret, but not with reservations. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] ([[User talk:Mglovesfun|talk]]) 16:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
# <code><nowiki>{{votesymbol|support|{{color|green}}}} {{boldtext|{{vote|s}}}} -- {{signature|</nowiki>[[User:Prince Kassad]]<nowiki>|{{date|revision}}}}</nowiki></code>


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====

Revision as of 18:01, 16 September 2010

User:Daniel. for desysopping

  • Nomination: I hereby nominate Daniel. (talkcontribs) to be removed as an English Wiktionary sysop. Despite criticism on his talk page, he continues to modify heavily used templates, sometimes breaking thousands of entries. In my personal opinion, he is not interested in improving Wiktionary but testing his ability as a program, creating unneeded templates to replace perfectly valid existing systems. On a related note, I don't support a (long) block unless he continues to edit wrecklessly. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Vote starts: now
  • Vote ends: 00:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support Mglovesfun (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC) as I noted in my edit summary, with regret, but not with reservations. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. {{votesymbol|support|{{color|green}}}} {{boldtext|{{vote|s}}}} -- {{signature|User:Prince Kassad|{{date|revision}}}}

Oppose

  1. Oppose, violently, vehemently. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein17:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain

  1. Abstain DCDuring TALK 17:28, 16 September 2010 (UTC) I would very much like to see documented the vast set of commonly templates that have been created and deployed without warrant. I would happily change my vote to Support if there is not substantial progress in this direction.[reply]

Decision