Wiktionary talk:Votes/bt-2011-11/User:GedawyBot for bot status (2)

Is there any evidence that our current interwiki bot — Luckas-bot (talk • contribs) — can't handle our needs? Or is this only just in case Luckas-bot goes down?​—msh210℠ (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Is there any problems to run my bot besides Luckas-bot? I think there is no need for comparing. --M.Gedawy 09:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

The following discussion has been moved from the page user talk:msh210.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

GedawyBot

Hello, Has this voting been closed? Could i start a new one? --M.Gedawy 01:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Yes.​—msh210℠ 08:49, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello Msh210. Excuse me, but you closed this vote less than 10 minutes after I left a comment. People did not even have the time to read. Could you please extend the normal delay ? Thanks, and have a nice evening. -- Quentinv57 ✍ 17:27, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Find the place closer to the top of the page where it says "vote ends". The vote ended. Your comment doesn't change that. People will have a chance to read it, but the vote is over, so it makes no effective difference. — [Ric Laurent] — 17:38, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

I would have closed it had you not commented. Your comment didn't change anything, since it wasn't about extending the vote, it wasn't a vote, it wasn't, well, anything to make me think I shouldn't close the vote: it was just chatting up Dan.​—msh210℠ 18:41, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, I did not saw that the vote period expired, because I never saw bot requests that stay opened only one day. I think this one should have been a bit extended as suggested by an other person, but I respect your decision and that's no more my problem. Regards, -- Quentinv57 ✍ 19:33, 1 December 2011 (UTC)