Talk:Mickey Mouse Protection Act

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Mickey Mouse Protection Act

I highly doubt this kind of stuff qualifies as dictionary material. -- Liliana • 22:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Easily citable in Google Books. I'm not sure what "this kind of stuff" means, though. --BB12 (talk) 00:41, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Struggling to see the deletion rationale too. It may be a proper noun, but it's not a brand and not especially deducible from its parts. Probably needs a humorous gloss. Equinox ◑ 00:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

It may be humorous, but it is still the name of a law. I bet most modern laws received nicknames like this, and I'm not sure we are the ones to cover them. -- Liliana • 08:45, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

In contrast to the Magna Carta, this presumably doesn't have any literary merit. Delete in this case, although I am more than willing to consider similar types of terms. DAVilla 14:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

What is the relationship of literary merit to Wiktionary? Keep. It has citations and satisfies the CFI. --BB12 (talk) 05:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Keep —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 07:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

 Weak Keep. On the other hand, I think its synonym, the Sonny Bono Act, may be SOP. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 17:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Kept.​—msh210℠ (talk) 08:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)