Talk:badass

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 5 months ago by 49.207.193.35 in topic Reorder entries
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Changes to definition[edit]

I think the current definition could use a lot of work, but I'm having a lot of trouble articulating it. Saying someone is a badass can be taken to mean they are cool, defiant, above the law, strong, skilful. From the vandalism-strewn history, it looks like this is a very often looked up word, so our readers will be delighted when one of us furnishes a more excellent definition (should I say, a more badass definition).  :-) Language Lover 04:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have never heard someone use the following sense of the word badass: (pejorative, slang) A mean or belligerent person.

Regional use?[edit]

Is the term limited to the USA? If so, there should be some kind of annotation.

Loqueelvientoajuarez 09:37, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Check sense 2 at nigger#Noun, which I just accidentally discovered. The definition confirms that at least some people recognise badass in a pejorative sense. More interestingly even, it gives me the impression that badass might have originated in Afro-American vernacular, as it seems to refer to an Afro-American stereotype. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 20:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Etymology[edit]

I'm curious: is it badass as in a bad donkey or as in a bad buttocks? 03:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)~

I'm pretty sure it refers to the buttocks, as if a person's ass were bad. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, compare hard-ass and hard-assed with a very similar meaning, where the original reference can hardly be to the animal, either. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 11:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

RFV 1[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Sense: "(pejorative, slang) A mean or belligerent person." I've never heard this word used in a negative way. Has anyone heard it used pejoratively? Ultimateria (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have: "don't mess with that guy, he's a real badass". My impression is that the pejorative uses for such terms tend to come first, then evolve through a grudging respect phase before arriving at the "cool, in an unconventional way" stage. Chuck Entz (talk) 04:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, the sense isn't there any more. - -sche (discuss) 21:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


Well, I've added it back. If the example is or has ever been idiomatic English, the sense needs to be in there (if necessary, marked as outdated). I'm not a native speaker, but the example sounds fine to me and I believe I have encountered it or similar ones. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

RFV 2[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Rfv-sense: "(pejorative, US, slang) A mean or belligerent person." Tagged but not listed. —RuakhTALK 16:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Seriously? That's its usual meaning surely? SpinningSpark 16:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
I don't think I've ever heard it to mean someone who is bad in the sense of malicious, harmful (etc.) Talk:badass#RFV seems to show this was previously listed but speedy deleted, so I think adding the sense back and re-tagging it with RFV is wholly appropriate; let's give it 30 days. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
SpinningSpark 17:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
moved from another section:

Re-added by Florian: see Talk:badass. I agree the sense is probably legit, but if it's failed RFV and been restored then it needs to go through the process and get citations. Equinox 21:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay, just noticed apparently the RFV is still open, in which case I don't know why it was moved to the talk page. Who knows what is going on. Someone who does know can delete or merge this with the discussion above. Thanks. Equinox 21:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
What happened: an RFV was opened; Jtle removed the sense out-of-process; when I noticed the sense had been gone for two months with no objection, I closed the RFV as "resolved". Florian re-added the sense, and we're actually trying to verify it this time. - -sche (discuss) 21:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm not convinced there are two senses here. I think it's just that the kind of people described in sense 1, "badasses", are often admired; sense 1 is currently poorly worded, IMO, but that they are admired (sense 2) doesn't strike me as a separate sense. - -sche (discuss) 02:08, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've combined the senses. - -sche (discuss) 22:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


RFV discussion: October 2017[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


If you look at the talk page and edit history, you see that sense 1 (use with a negative connotation) was RFVed, removed, re-added without citations, RFVed again, removed, and readded again without citations. So:

  1. Are there citations of sense 1?
  2. Does it make sense to have two separate senses, or does this word basically have one sense/ definition, "a person with extreme attitudes or behavior or appearance", and speakers just differ in whether they consider such a person to be good or bad?

(Btw, I think there are two other ways to form the graded forms of the adjective: "baddest-ass" and "badassest".) - -sche (discuss) 04:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is "worst-ass" attested? Khemehekis (talk) 20:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

cited Kiwima (talk) 04:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 04:09, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

President of Ukraine[edit]

His picture should be added to this entry! 109.173.145.67 22:27, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reorder entries[edit]

This term is generally used in the positive sense, with many not having even heard it be used negatively (myself included). It's probably better to move the positive entries above the negative ones for clarity (and possibly also mark the negative entries as archaic?) - 49.207.193.35 13:58, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply