Talk:botiality
Latest comment: 7 years ago by JohnC5 in topic RFD discussion: March–April 2017
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Only 8 hits on google. botialities gets none. Borders on protologism. —JohnC5 17:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Speedied as a clear protologism. I'm assuming your placing it in RFD rather than RFV was simply a careless mistake, and that your unwillingness to speedy it was due to a desire to avoid conflict with the creator, but the lack of raw Google hits shows that this could obviously not pass WT:ATTEST. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Metaknowledge: Yeah, I was being overly proceduralist because I grow tired of these arguments. I also so rarely do things that involve RFD/V that I always mess it up. —JohnC5 21:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- @JohnC5: I will take over the arguing for you if you need me to. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Metaknowledge: Thank you! —JohnC5 21:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- @JohnC5: I will take over the arguing for you if you need me to. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Metaknowledge: Yeah, I was being overly proceduralist because I grow tired of these arguments. I also so rarely do things that involve RFD/V that I always mess it up. —JohnC5 21:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)