Talk:buzulkuşu
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
This is a fabricated word by a wiki user "123Snake45" --— This unsigned comment was added by 2001:a98:c060:80:5c72:a2:7284:c8c5 (talk) at 06:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC).
- Originally, yes, but it was deleted. The recent history is rather interesting:
- First 88.251.11.170 adds a couple of entries (türküm and düşerge) that another IP tags for rfv, then 88.251.11.170 removes the rfv tags (in an edit comment they blame the IP for creating buzulkuşu, in effect saying that the other IP is really 123Snake45), for which I block them. Within a few hours, 88.251.247.209 appears out of nowhere to re-create the buzulkuşu entry a year after it was deleted- gee, what a coincidence! There's also an interlocking chain of similar "coincidences" linking you to birdem, which 123Snake45 just rfved, and to the aforementioned pair of entries. Chuck Entz (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
If you google buzulkuşu 123snake45 site:wiktionary.org you may see this word was firstly added to the wikis by that user. --2001:A98:C060:80:9115:A112:A710:C3AE 09:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
88.251.* is a very common IP prefix of Turkey. --2001:41D0:2:BF1C:C35F:E5F6:161D:D99A 19:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sure it is, but the overall pattern of behavior was my point- the similarity of the IPs was just icing on the cake. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
— Ungoliant (Falai) 02:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not a single hit in Google Books or Google Groups. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah. I figured it’s one of those neologisms people were complaining about a few months ago. — Ungoliant (Falai) 04:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Gone. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:33, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah. I figured it’s one of those neologisms people were complaining about a few months ago. — Ungoliant (Falai) 04:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Note that buzulkuşu is Diuca speculifera according to Avibase and Observado. Some web dictionaries contain this word, too.