Talk:unownable

RFV discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

RfV-sense for "That cannot be owned; that cannot be overwhelmed or embarrassed by anyone."
Since I couldn't find any durably-archived uses of *(deprecated template usage) unpwnable after a cursory search, I also doubt that any (or at least many) will be found of (deprecated template usage) unownable in this sense.  — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

well, I've got one cite so far. Anyone?​—msh210℠ 16:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Why are two senses combined in one line? How could a normal user not think there was something shoddy about our work? Most of the usage will almost certainly be of the boringly conventional sense. Was a contributor trying to avoid the need to separately cite the novel sense? DCDuring TALK 20:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, sense removed. —Ruakh_TALK 00:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)