Script error at [[naturistas]]

Jump to navigation Jump to search

WT:ACCEL automatically filled the gender at m-f-p and it threw a script error. Can you either fix the script (and the entry) to use whatever the correct notation is for masc and fem plural or allow for m-f-p in the module? Thanks

Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds05:14, 3 July 2013

Correct would be "m-p|f-p". But I'm not sure how to fix the script without also changing the way the editor itself functions. And that would probably need some consensus.

Never mind, I thought you were talking about the translation editor. I've provided a temporary fix to {{es-noun}} and {{es-adj}} by removing the gender annotations from the headword. They are not really necessary anyway because the definition already has the gender in it (for adjectives).

CodeCat12:34, 3 July 2013

So now newly created plurals won't mark for gender, even if they're nouns?

Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds17:11, 3 July 2013

For now, no. Is that really such a big problem? We don't mark plural forms for gender most of the time, that I am aware.

CodeCat17:15, 3 July 2013

It's inconsistent; I actually don't mind either way, but I like things to be unified.

Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds17:20, 3 July 2013

I brought it up two months ago at WT:ID#Where is gender information appropriate?

CodeCat17:24, 3 July 2013