Category talk:English leet
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Conrad.Irwin in topic Category:Leet
From WT:RFM:
- Discussion moved from WT:RFDO#Category:Leet.
I'd expect words related to leetspeak in these topically-named categories as they exist, not the entries n00b and h4x0r. Per other dialect categories, this might be Category:Leet English. --Daniel. 01:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Unsure. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep as-is, I've never heard of "leet English", "English leet" might make sense, which is really what Category:en:Leet would say. Conrad.Irwin 14:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- No. Category:en:Leet and Category:English leet would serve different purposes, according to the Wiktionary category naming system. --Daniel. 09:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- These are words from Leet that have entered somewhat regular usage, correct? If so, shouldn't these be at Category:Leet derivations and Category:no:Leet derivations, with words related to Leet being at Category:Leet and Category:no:Leet? --Yair rand 22:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- They are words used in a leet-y way, some of them have become common, but I don't think that stops them being leet. [[:Category:Slang]] and [[:Category:no:Slang]] seem (to me at least) be analogous, leet is just a slang afterall. (i.e. I still favour the current categorisation). Conrad.Irwin 23:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- These are words from Leet that have entered somewhat regular usage, correct? If so, shouldn't these be at Category:Leet derivations and Category:no:Leet derivations, with words related to Leet being at Category:Leet and Category:no:Leet? --Yair rand 22:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- No. Category:en:Leet and Category:English leet would serve different purposes, according to the Wiktionary category naming system. --Daniel. 09:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)