Module talk:hierarchy

Sundry discussions

@Kc kennylau: It seems that something (probably some of CodeCat’s new updates to the category modules) has broken Module:category tree/poscatboiler/hierarchy and Module:category tree/topic cat/hierarchy/documentation. Thought you should know. —JohnC5 20:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Maior? --kc_kennylau (talk) 06:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Certe! Also, care to help me with this? —JohnC5 07:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Specificārēsne? --kc_kennylau (talk) 07:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: I was thinking of merging all German verbs into one headword ({{de-verb}}) and have it auto-detect whether strong and weak verbs and maybe even the class of strong verb and irregular verbs. Since you worked so assiduously on mod:de-conj, I thought you might be able to help with the detection, etc. I also felt like you would appreciate the Luacization process regardless. Satin' tibi explicāvī et vīn' mē adiuvāre? —JohnC5 07:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Certe. --kc_kennylau (talk) 07:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Grātiās tibi agō! —JohnC5 07:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Could you specify the place that I should work on, by creating a placeholder and using "--TODO: detect type" in the module? --kc_kennylau (talk) 07:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: ecce! —JohnC5 08:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: ecce quod significāvī --kc_kennylau (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Quaeso reperire methodum spectandi functionem. --kc_kennylau (talk) 10:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Quaeso visum Mod:de-headword/testcases et adiunctum. --kc_kennylau (talk) 10:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Mē paenitet morae; fuī occupātus. Libenter plūra exempla adiungam. —JohnC5 07:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Triste, hoc templātum accipere lemmata multōrum verbōrum dēbēbit. —JohnC5 07:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

@JohnC5: Non illud intenditur. --kc_kennylau (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: In t:de-verb sunt multa lemmata multōrum verbōrum. Quod faciēmus cum eīs? —JohnC5 20:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Sunt multa lemmata multiverborum, sed verba adhuc primeunt _{(primus + eunt)}. --kc_kennylau (talk) 10:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Dīcisne verba germānica in lemmatibus primīre? Istud modum, quod dēscrībis, numquam vīdī. —JohnC5 15:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: In flexione non lammate. Vide tabulam flexionis verbi "durch den Kakao ziehen". --kc_kennylau (talk) 16:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Vērās! Grātiās tibi agō prō corrēctiōnibus tuīs. —JohnC5 16:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Placet mihi. --kc_kennylau (talk) 16:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Dēbēmusne nunc incipere lemmata ad novum templātum movēre et novā ratiōne ūtī? —JohnC5 16:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Quomodolibet. --kc_kennylau (talk) 17:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Ūtērisne robotō tuō? —JohnC5 17:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

@JohnC5: Cras. --kc_kennylau (talk) 17:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: optimē! —JohnC5 17:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Potesne agere mutationem per exemplum? --kc_kennylau (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Spērābam nōs prīmum trānsclūsiōnēs dē {{de-verb}} ad {{de-verb-strong}} {{de-verb-weak}}que mōtūrī esse et tunc nōs {{de-verb}}, ut mod:de-headword ūtātur, mūtātūrī esse, et dēmum nōs dē {{de-verb-strong}} {{de-verb-weak}}que ad {{de-verb}} mōtūrī esse. Accēdisne? —JohnC5 15:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Itane? --kc_kennylau (talk) 15:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: sīc! —JohnC5 16:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Difficilis irrēgulārī, non fīō robotī. --kc_kennylau (talk) 17:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Vērō. Mōvimentum prīmum difficile et manū faciendum est, sed mōvimentum secundum facilius robotō facere erit. —JohnC5 17:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Aliqua difficilia maximē, non movēre possum. --kc_kennylau (talk) 14:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

@Kc kennylau: Ea movēbō, sed lente. —JohnC5 15:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

@JohnC5: Coeuntī celerēs erimus. --kc_kennylau (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)