Talk:бухнуть

(Notifying Atitarev, Cinemantique, Useigor, Wanjuscha, Wikitiki89, Stephen G. Brown, Per utramque cavernam, Guldrelokk, Fay Freak, Tetromino): This appears to be the only imperfective transitive verb in -нуть given in Zaliznyak. Is this a mistake and it should be intransitive? The meaning "to swell up" is intransitive. Benwing2 (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

@Benwing2 This verb is so infrequent that I possibly have not heard it at all, and I cannot search it because of the homonyms. But since even набуха́ть (nabuxátʹ) is imperfective and intransitive, probably it is correct that it is imperfective and intransitive. Russian Wiktionary has 8 that allegedly go the same, with the same aspect, in one category and there is also another category that has 35 verbs now of which all have the declension table in the way that the perfect masculine can keep or drop ну alternatively but the feminine and neuter drop it and is else the same, so дро́гнуть. Note that the very frequent verb бухну́ть, бухну́, бухнёшь which is semelfactive to буха́ть “to booze” yet is missing on the page. Fay Freak (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

@Fay Freak Thanks. I added the slang term. Benwing2 (talk) 20:39, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

@Benwing2: Thanks. Fay Freak has answered your question. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 21:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)