Talk:դիւր

@Vahagn Petrosyan: Thanks for this. I'm curious about your method for drawing up these lists of derived terms; they are always very complete. Do you extract them from somewhere? You don't do that by hand, right? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Per utramque cavernam: I have the list of headwords of {{R:xcl:NHB}} in an electronic format. I search *lemma* in it, check that the match is not coincidental, then add the few derived words which {{R:xcl:HAB}} usually mentions as not included in NHB. I hope to include all derived terms of a root, because in practice no entry will be created for most of them in our lifetime. If a user's search discovers the compound in two root entries, then he can combine the roots himself and more or less understand the meaning. --Vahag (talk) 15:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Vahagn Petrosyan: Thank you for the explanation. I wholeheartedly support this method. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)