Talk:塤
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense for "simplified variant of 壎" definition; the 塤 character is already a traditional character for its primary definition and this instance isn't cited or in the Unihan database. Bumm13 (talk) 10:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's right. The simplified version of 塤 is 埙 and 壎 is both traditional and simplified. It's not the right way to display simplified/traditional equivalents, anyway. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 10:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- RFV failed on the sense: no quotations provided. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)