Talk:甩轆

RFV discussion: August–October 2023

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

甩轆

Chinese. Rfv-sense: "(figuratively) to be extremely busy". To my knowledge 甩轆 itself does not carry this meaning, only does so in 忙到甩轆 "to be so busy that mistakes are made". – Wpi (talk) 08:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Delete. -- Ywhy (talk) 04:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

This is not RFD. A "delete" does nothing for verification. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 02:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

A cold definite Delete is what wrong sense deserves. Calling it Unverified is an understatement. No native says that. -- Ywhy (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

• RFV failed. (Just to reiterate, the claim that "no native says that" holds no weight in the verification process since there is no way to back that up. The lack of evidence of existence only gives us a reason to doubt its existence.) — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 05:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

I sense that a clarification is in order. I had retracted[1] the harsh comment but someone reverted it and essentially stuffed words into my mouth. Pardon me for breathing. -- Ywhy (talk) 15:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

@Ywhy: Apologies for the misunderstanding. For next time, it would be advisable to not remove other people's comments and instead use <s></s> to strike out what is intended to be retracted. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 18:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)