Talk:𑀯𑀼𑀠

@Bhagadatta Yes, {{R:inc:CGMIA|52}} has:

Sanskrit -rdh- → Prakrit -ḍḍh-

Terms derived from Sanskrit वृद्ध (vṛddha):

Ashokan Prakrit (Shahbazgarhi, Dhauli): vuḍha-

Pali and Dramatic Prakrits: vuḍḍha-

At {{R:CDIAL}} it says:

man. vadhra -- (vudhra -- ?),

Perhaps the reason for this is that although the Hultzsch transcription vudhra, Hultzsch also mentions that the Bühler transcription is vadhra

The term is also at Nala_Sopara#Sopara_Edicts_of_Ashoka fragment as:

vuḍhānaṁ dasane [ca] hiraṁna-paṭividhāne ca

hiraṁna has entry at 𑀳𑀺𑀭𑀁𑀦 (hiraṃna) Kutchkutch (talk) 09:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@Kutchkutch: Thanks a lot for checking! I do have a soft copy of CGMIA downloaded from archive.org but for some reason the pages are all hopelessly jumbled and not in order. The issue with the transcription of 𐨬𐨢𐨿𐨪 (vadhra) is why I left the entry uncreated. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴)} 10:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bhagadatta: hopelessly jumbled and not in order is exactly what I think when I look at:

https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.143102 Kutchkutch (talk) 10:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)