Talk:-statin
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Not really a suffix. See statin. DCDuring TALK 11:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- The etymology of the entry "statin" says that this was a suffix before it became a word in its own right. Compare ism vs. -ism. If the ety is correct, I would say keep. --Hekaheka 12:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Only AHD among OneLook Dictionaries provides etymological information, curiously close to what we show. Google Scholar does not cover years before 1990. A Google Books reference from 1959 mentions "statin" and names ending in "statin". We may not be able to improve our entries. DCDuring TALK 13:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per Hekaheka, provided the etymology of "statin" is correct. MWO says in "statin" that "statin" is derived from "-statin"[1]. AHD says that "statin" is derived from names ending in "-statin"[2]. Can you post a hyperlink to "A Google Books reference from 1959"? --Dan Polansky 00:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- In that case, keep. DAVilla 15:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per Hekaheka, provided the etymology of "statin" is correct. MWO says in "statin" that "statin" is derived from "-statin"[1]. AHD says that "statin" is derived from names ending in "-statin"[2]. Can you post a hyperlink to "A Google Books reference from 1959"? --Dan Polansky 00:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Only AHD among OneLook Dictionaries provides etymological information, curiously close to what we show. Google Scholar does not cover years before 1990. A Google Books reference from 1959 mentions "statin" and names ending in "statin". We may not be able to improve our entries. DCDuring TALK 13:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)