Talk:ACTT
RFV discussion
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Twenty different senses given, none of which are on their face obvious candidates for inclusion. At what point do we permit inclusion of an abbreviated name of a trade organization or private company? Should those meet the CFI for brand names? bd2412 T 16:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- I asked a similar question about an entry I created - RMIT - but received no answer. ---> Tooironic 22:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
RFV failed, entry deleted. —RuakhTALK 22:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)