Talk:Leninism

Words, their explicates and linguistic ideological and propaganda fetishism

@Benwing2: Can we abandon such definitions of words that more closely resemble the definition of explicate terms? Gnosandes ❀ (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Gnosandes, Equinox I'm not quite sure what you mean, but IMO the definition you put in place doesn't seem super helpful as it doesn't describe what Leninism is. I think it would be better to copy the first line from Leninism on Wikipedia. Benwing2 (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

@Benwing2: That's the problem, each authors has its own definition of the term, but not the word. Therefore, we should not refer to Wikipedia, which gives only one definition and not even a dynamic one. Gnosandes ❀ (talk) 05:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

@Gnosandes: You have shown your inability to be neutral so you should stay away from political entries, as requested on your talk page more than once. You'll now cry "NEUTRAL JUST MEANS WESTERN CONSENSUS" but it really doesn't. However, it's impossible to convince the paranoid. Maybe you could go and work on Russian Wiktionary more happily? Equinox ◑ 02:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

@Equinox: Why should I say that, and what does a paranoid person have to do with it? You say it so freely, as if you are not involved in science. What does the West have to do with it? I have my close relatives in Belarus, Ukraine, Slovenia, Czech but what does it change? I think that thanks to this, I see the world a little wider than you do. If I'm wrong, I've always accepted my mistake, you've probably noticed it here. Consensus should be with voting, I don't see voting here. Gnosandes ❀ (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

So start a vote. Equinox ◑ 10:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)