Talk:abvolate

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 1 year ago by This, that and the other in topic RFV discussion: May–June 2023
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: May–June 2023

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


dictionary-only per OED. Nothing citable from GBooks/archive.org, except for one use here.—蒼鳥 fawk. tell me if i did anything wrong. 11:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed, goes to Appendix:English dictionary-only terms This, that and the other (talk) 10:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Probably the reason for lack of attestation is that this word is the product of bad latinitas. The correct form would be avolate. This, that and the other (talk) 10:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply