The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
- The problem with copying verbatim from a 199 year old dictionary is that the English is so out-of-date that you can't understand it! I think there was another Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue entry that failed RFV this year. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have deleted it and will archive this section now. — Beobach 02:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)