Talk:antropo
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Uncited form. I doubt this can be properly cited as an independent word. Robin van der Vliet (talk) (contribs) 01:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- RFV-deleted — surjection ⟨??⟩ 16:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Previously failed RFV. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 20:09, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- This entry should be categorized as a pseudoprefix, antropo-. As far as I can tell, it is only attested as standalone term in Plena Ilustrita Vortaro (PIV) 2020, with terms such as antropologio, antropocentra, antropoidoj supposedly compounds thereof. However, this seems clearly wrong to me, and other dictionaries (ReVo, Kondratjev etc.) disgaree with PIV that this is a legitimate root. Audrey (talk) 20:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)