Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
Rfv-sense: 3 senses. 2 seem UK and probably included in broader definitions just added (which could bear more improvement). One broader sense is included in one of the new senses, but but awkwardly. DCDuringTALK 12:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Senses 3, 4 & 5 would all be generally understood in the UK, but are they not all just particular uses of sense 2? Do we need to include every nuance of meaning? Dbfirs 15:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes they are of course as Dbfirs suggests. It is a very fine point to suggest that an omnibus edition of a soap is a catch up. It is a repitition. The suspect entries have been removed. RTG 06:22, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
No they're not removed now, apparently the discussion needs to go on a bit longer. RTG 22:22, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
I think sense 4 and 5 could very easily be more obviously included in sense to by changing that from "An amount, thing, or receipt of information that enables one to catch up." to "An amount, thing, or, receipt or repetition of information that enables one to catch up." Thryduulf (talk) 21:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC)