Add how one is supposed to spell "the document is not copyable with an ordinary Xerox machine." Jidanni 21:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- copyable is normal, but copiable is also seen. "copyible" would seem to be wrong. SemperBlotto 22:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I've added a citation that shows copy as in copy that is used sometimes as a noun. 18.104.22.168 20:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
sense 2 : of inferior quality
Is this necessary of inferior quality? I mean, we are used to see copy of rich brand products to a lower quality, but is this a generality?
A not famous brand imitating another not famous brand but with a better material/technology (imitating because they figured out that it is an opportunity or that the product/the design is a good idea), it is not a copy? A famous French movie picturing that is called "La vérité si je mens".