Talk:cowen
Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche in topic RFV
RFV
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Keep_tidy.svg/55px-Keep_tidy.svg.png)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Really? SemperBlotto 11:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Surely it's cowan, not cowen. But the definition given at cowan seems to differ from the one at cowen and is maybe an older meaning of the word.--Dmol 12:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- The OED [2ⁿᵈ ed., 1989] has (deprecated template usage) cowen, but only as an eighteenth-century spelling of (deprecated template usage) cowan (which sense I've just added to our entry); note that its entry is (AFAICT) unchanged from that of the NED [1ˢᵗ ed., 1893] except for the addition of one quotation. Rather than being some older sense, “someone who is not a witch”, if such usage exists, is probably a more recent (i.e., post–nineteenth-century) adoption of the Masonic term by Wiccan and/or Neopagan groups. As for “the commander of the genii (chief cowen)”, that usage, if its exists, is wholly unlike the other senses we have, and may be a corruption of the term by conflation with coven. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 02:30, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Disputed senses RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 04:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)