Talk:egle

Cidi Al-Masri Indianapolis, Indiana & Tripoly, Libya YLC Lexicon Sephard Magnetrababa

Melachim Alef 12:28 Orthodox Jewish Bible (OJB)

28 Whereupon HaMelech took counsel, and made two eglei zahav (calves of gold), and said unto them, It is too much for you to go up to Yerushalayim; hinei, eloheicha, O Yisroel, which brought thee up out of Eretz Mitzrayim.

Orthodox Jewish Bible (OJB) Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2008, 2010, 2011 by Artists for Israel International

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Melachim+Alef+12%3A28&version=OJB

1. We don't do romanization entries for Hebrew.
2. Your quote is for "eglei", not "egle". Of course, that's the plural construct form, but the singular absolute form would be "egel", so there's no point in bringing it up here. Chuck Entz (talk) 13:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello.

1. Ashkenazi is German. Not Hebrew, not even vaguely the same as Hebrew, closer to OED history of "High German".
2. German is a Romanized language, as is french, italian, romanian, portugese, spanish. Latin or romanized letters did not exist at the time the bible existed.
3. Ashkenazi did not exist until after the 1099 AD theft of the Aleppo Codex, then Ashkenazi first entry into history is the 1200's AD.
4. Ashkenazi is not Hebrew, it is German or High German, not existing until after 1099 AD Siege of Aleppo, first record 1258 AD Ashkenazi a Pigeon Language
5. These verses were added telling the Family Tree of J1 HaploTree supermodels of Jerusalem to no longer encourage their sons and daughters to make the pilgrimage of Hajj or Pilgrim progress. Cidi Al-Masri Tripoly Libya YLC Lexicon (talk) 16:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

1. Ashkenazi isn't a language. Yiddish is the Germanic language you're probably thinking of, since it's spoken by Askhenazi people. The Hebrew scriptures are in Hebrew, which has no resemblance whatsoever to any Germanic language.
2. Yes, those languages use the Roman/Latin alphabet. So what? This isn't any of those languages, but it does contain Romanized Hebrew. I checked the Hebrew scripture quoted before writing my reply, and the Romanized Hebrew words correspond pretty much exactly to the original Hebrew.
3. This part of the Hebrew scriptures predates Muhammad and the introduction of Islam by quite a number of centuries. This particular verse is found at Qumran and in manuscripts of various translations such as the Septuagint that also can be securely dated.
4. I won't comment on the rest, except to say that it's mostly incoherent, utterly without any historical foundation, and extremely racist. It's all beside the point, anyway, because you have the wrong word- it doesn't matter what language "eglei" is, this is the talk page for "egle", not "eglei". Chuck Entz (talk) 05:25, 18 June 2019 (UTC)