Talk:fooder

RFV discussion — sense failed

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Contributor says it's a protologism, but I'm not so sure.—msh210℠ 21:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I find it almost exclusively in terms like "free-fooder", "raw fooder", "raw-fooder", "fast-fooder", "anti-fast-fooder". IOW it is almost always formed by adding (deprecated template usage) -er to an open or hyphenated compound. How should it be presented, then, whether or not it an be attested as a stand-alone? DCDuring TALK 21:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Added that sense (and others which are attested); converted this to a {{rfv-sense}}.—msh210℠ 23:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, sense removed. Thanks, msh210, for the other senses, and for the citations for them. —Ruakh_TALK 01:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)