Talk:haxx0r
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Equinox in topic Request for verification
Wiktionary:Requests for deletion - kept
[edit]Kept. See archived discussion of February 2009. 07:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Request for verification
[edit]
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Sent hither from RFD, where it was kept on condition it's attested.—msh210℠ 23:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Only one Googlebooks entry that I could find, and it is already cited in the article. Could not find any definitions in any other online dictionary. This looks to me like it could be a neologism, or protologism. I cannot verfy this entry at this time. Razorflame 06:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- I added that book one and forgot to mention it here. There's plenty more on Usenet, though, if anyone is inclined to wade through it. Equinox ◑ 17:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't feel comfortable passing it with pseduonyms like "VoRtEx" and "Mentski", although in all honesty those are better quotations than the other Usenet cite, which is intentionally illiterate. DAVilla 19:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Passed RFV. Leet words are, anyhow, "intentionally illiterate", but they are still words, just like the (attestable) eye dialect that we document. Equinox ◑ 17:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)