Talk:lix
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Urszag in topic RFV discussion: June 2023–June 2024
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Latin alternative form of lixa (“lye; water”). Marked as "dubious" Leasnam (talk) 02:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- "RFV-failed". Lindsay 1891, cited below by Nicodene, argues that "lixetiam" (read/printed by some editions as "lix etiam") is really just a corruption of "lixaetiam" (lixa etiam); in any case, the gender and oblique forms seem to be unattested, so I'm removing them now. It seems like there could be an argument for keeping the form but adding more explanation of why it is dubious.--Urszag (talk) 10:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)