Talk:man of parts
Does the term not mean the same as the Scots 'man o' pairts', i.e. a Renaissance man? That is, an educated man with a wide range of interests? 93.96.236.8 19:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
RFV
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
I request verification specifically of this part: "This includes but is not limited to the area of seduction. He puts very little emphasis on memorized scripts or "peacocking" and instead relies on individualized ways to charm a woman." Merriam-Webster has only the first part: a man talented in multiple areas. Note the old Tea Room discussion: Wiktionary:Tea room/2009/July#man_of_parts. - -sche (discuss) 02:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think it adds anything to the meaning. Is there any reason to keep it even if it includes talent in seduction? --BenjaminBarrett12 (talk) 06:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 17:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)