Talk:mikrooprogramowanie
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Two mentions on google books, no results in the National Corpus of Polish. First 6-7 pages of results in Google(with quotation marks) comprise EN→PL dictionaries and lists of translations of EN IT terms(there is one actual use on page 5). Mistrz (talk) 16:55, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Rare, significantly less common than "oprogramowanie ukladowe", but it is in use:
- http://www.nfjp.pl/lemma/mikrooprogramowanie
- http://www.packardbell.com/pb/pl/PL/content/windows10-eligible-models "może być konieczna instalacja dodatkowego oprogramowania, mikrooprogramowania lub aktualizacja systemu BIOS"
- http://www.packardbell.com/pb/en/GB/content/windows10-eligible-models "your system may require additional software, firmware, and/or a BIOS update"
- http://www-935.ibm.com/services/pl/gts/pdf/ZP_IBM_Rozszerzone_Wsparcie_Techniczne_dla_sieci_SAN_i_pamieci_masowych_arch.pdf --79.186.128.165 18:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- First link looks good, I've added the citation, packardbell one is not durably archived and the IBM one is a bit doubtful, since it is an annex to a legal contract and the „mikrooprogramowanie” there is a part of legal terms definition, defined as „oprogramowanie układowe”; further uses within that document are a requirement to form a legally binding contract, so it might be treated as a mention, IMHO ;) – even if we would count it as an use instead of mention, it's still not durably archived, so 2 more uses are needed(Polish is a well documented language). Mistrz (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- RFV failed. I don't think I would discard something as a mention on the grounds that it was defined previously in the text. Scientific and math texts often include such definitions for the sake of accessibility.__Gamren (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- First link looks good, I've added the citation, packardbell one is not durably archived and the IBM one is a bit doubtful, since it is an annex to a legal contract and the „mikrooprogramowanie” there is a part of legal terms definition, defined as „oprogramowanie układowe”; further uses within that document are a requirement to form a legally binding contract, so it might be treated as a mention, IMHO ;) – even if we would count it as an use instead of mention, it's still not durably archived, so 2 more uses are needed(Polish is a well documented language). Mistrz (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)