Talk:na'via
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RFV[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
I consider the odds of this meeting WT:FICTION to be rather low. See also #Na'vi, above. - -sche (discuss) 00:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not so pessimistic. Some Esperantists like to contrast Esperanto linguistically with other planlingvoj like Elvish, Klingon, Na'vi, or Dothraki quite separate from their fictional universes. I've added some Web cites, though print cites may be difficult. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- As you note, those are web citations, and thus not durable (at least not unless the WebCite vote passes). The first citation of na'via (from 2010) also specifies that it is the language of the film Avatar, which IMO means it doesn't meet WT:FICTION standards; the citation of na'via lingvo also references the film (and is apparently a translation of something by the person who created the language for the film, and thus of questionable independence in that regard, as well). - -sche (discuss) 01:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 00:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)