Talk:octaviate

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

These quotations were in the entry, but were arguably for other lemmata:

  • 1987, Stephen McAdams, Music and psychology: a mutual regard, volume 2, page 247:
    The octave, another form of periodicity, was disturbing to the point where one could dream of non-octaviated spaces (Wychnegradsky, Varese, Boulez).
  • (Can we date this quote?) Toshio Hosokawa, Imke Misch, Christoph von Blumröder, Komposition und Musikwissenschaft im Dialog III (1999-2001), page 141:
    The structure of this tone octaviating is of course very particular in a funny way, but more generally many tones or sounds which do not have an harmonic spectrum []

RFV discussion: August 2011–March 2012[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Pretty rare; rarer than octavate, at any rate. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 20:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced the citations I've added all support the given sense; take a look. There are a few more citations that could be added. - -sche (discuss) 01:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strike that, I've found a less gibberish-y citation. I'll call this cited. - -sche (discuss) 01:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid not. The 1987 quot. used a participial adjective (octaviated) and the dateless quot. uses a verbal noun (octaviating). The 1992 quot.'s fine, however. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 02:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Right you are, and I could find one more citation (to make 2 good ones), but not a third. Banished to the citations namespace. - -sche (discuss) 04:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Subsequently cited. - -sche (discuss) 05:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]