Talk:plus ultra
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Imetsia in topic RFD discussion: April 2022–May 2024
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Latin. Sum of parts, even if given a proper definition. This, that and the other (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, it’s a phrase and motto, not an
{{&lit}}def. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 19:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)- Being a motto doesn't make a phrase entry-worthy. We don't have an entry because you're worth it defined as "Advertising slogan of L'Oréal". Plus, what would the definition even be? "Personal motto of Charles V (1500–1558)" is an encyclopedic detail rather than a definition. This, that and the other (talk) 03:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a rally to go “beyond”, to go explore beyond the known borders (“where no man has gone before” :) If this gets deleted, why would non plus ultra be kept?. – Jberkel 08:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Being a motto doesn't make a phrase entry-worthy. We don't have an entry because you're worth it defined as "Advertising slogan of L'Oréal". Plus, what would the definition even be? "Personal motto of Charles V (1500–1558)" is an encyclopedic detail rather than a definition. This, that and the other (talk) 03:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It is sum of parts. It should be treated as English, maybe? Like other mottos (see: e pluribus unum). non plus ultra is not a motto. Sartma (talk) 10:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- RFD-kept by no consensus. Imetsia (talk (more)) 23:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)