Talk:riche

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: October 2022–February 2023[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Seemingly spurious; the OED fails to note any post-1500 use, while the term is missing from the EDD. The two quotes present at the entry are not English, but Early Scots (treated as a kind of Middle English at Wiktionary, though this status is not unambiguous or undisputed), and therefore cannot be relied upon considered to provide evidence of usage. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out that this term was revived by either Victorian or modern fetishisers of Anglo-Saxon culture, but evidence is needed for this supposition. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 23:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RFV Failed along with rike. Ioaxxere (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]