Talk:sesquidierum

RFV discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

sēsquidiērum and sēsquidiēbus

These inflections of sēsquidiēs are not attestable. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 11:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Is there a semantic reason (i.e. no plural entry if the word uncountable) to assume this word doesn’t have genitive, dative and ablative plurals? — Ungoliant ^(Falai) 20:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, there is a semantic reason, the plurals of "one and a half day" start with "three days". — This unsigned comment was added by Erik Warmelink (talk • contribs) at 10:12, 29 September 2013‎.

Why only the genitive, dative and ablative? — Ungoliant ^(Falai) 19:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

The nominative, vocative, and accusative are isomorphic with the lemma form, so obviously they can't be deleted. This is apparently purely a New Latin word; it certainly isn't Classical Latin, and I strongly doubt it's ever attested in the plural (in any Case). —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

RFV failed, entries deleted. I've also updated the declension table at sesquidies to list only singular forms. —Ruakh_TALK 19:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)