Talk:sesquidies

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion for *sēsquidiērum and *sēsquidiēbus[edit]

Keep tidy.svg

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


sēsquidiēs’s genitive, dative, and ablative plural forms

These inflections of sēsquidiēs are not attestable. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 11:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Is there a semantic reason (i.e. no plural entry if the word uncountable) to assume this word doesn’t have genitive, dative and ablative plurals? — Ungoliant (Falai) 20:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes, there is a semantic reason, the plurals of "one and a half day" start with "three days". —This unsigned comment was added by Erik Warmelink (talkcontribs) at 10:12, 29 September 2013‎.
Why only the genitive, dative and ablative? — Ungoliant (Falai) 19:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The nominative, vocative, and accusative are isomorphic with the lemma form, so obviously they can't be deleted. This is apparently purely a New Latin word; it certainly isn't Classical Latin, and I strongly doubt it's ever attested in the plural (in any Case). —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

RFV failed, entries deleted. I've also updated the declension table at sesquidies to list only singular forms. —RuakhTALK 19:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)