The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
SoP. The cough is evidently from a smoker already. TeleComNasSprVen 07:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Not every cough from a smoker is smoker's cough. It's a specific thing. Ƿidsiþ 07:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- keep since a person does not necessarily need to smoke to get a smoker's cough. -- Prince Kassad 09:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. It is used as if to describe a medical condition or symptom. DCDuring TALK 11:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, same reasons. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, I concur. ---> Tooironic 13:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per previous commenters. I've added a cite that I think highlights Widsith's point. —RuakhTALK 21:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- If Prince Kassad or DCDuring is right (and I don't doubt it), then we need a better definition than the current "The cough someone gets as a result of habitual smoking"!—msh210℠ (talk) 18:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Added "persistent" to the definition. --Hekaheka 11:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Kept. DAVilla 11:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)