Talk:theosophe
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
RFV for the alleged Latin adverb theosophē (“theosophically”). Not in Lewis & Short, du Cange, Gaffiot, the OLD, Niermeyer, or the NLW. Only du Cange and Niermeyer have entries for the related noun theosophus (“theologian”). — I.S.M.E.T.A. 01:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- Dictionaries often do not include adverbs derived from 1st/2nd declension adjectives (adjetive in -us and adverb in -e, like theosophus -> theosophe). If there are theosophus and theosophically, then it's not unlikely that there's theosophe. -80.133.119.105 18:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- It's not too unlikely, no, but there has yet to be presented any evidence that theosophē exists. (See WT:CFI.) — I.S.M.E.T.A. 12:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- I looked through Google Books diligently and only found the vocative singular. RFV failed. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
English section. The two References sections need to be combined. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 13:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Done 14:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, Angr. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)